data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/01d69/01d69d9c8195d446e97223454322a4845481d09f" alt="Return to Contents" |
Chapter 17: Aldehydes
and Ketones. Nucleophilic Addition to C=O |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6de00/6de00da4400febe21f0a336db510e843289ee4a7" alt="Ch 17 contents" |
Reactivity
Overall a simple nucleophilic addition can be represented with curly arrows
as follows:
The reactivity of aldehydes
and ketones can be easily rationalised by considering the important resonance
contributor which has charge separation with a +ve C and -ve O. |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5732e/5732e157e747fb8f461338313858be21281ea600" alt="resoance in a ketone" |
QUESTION Why is this resonance
structure more important than the one with a -ve C and +ve O ? ANSWER |
|
In general the
reactivity order towards nucleophiles is : aldehydes > ketones (see
below)
The substituents have two contributing factors on the reactivity at the
carbonyl C: |
- Size of the substituents
attached to the C=O. Larger groups will tend to sterically
hinder the approach of the Nu.
- The electronic effect
of the substituent. Alkyl groups are weakly electron donating so they
make the C in the carbonyl less electrophilic and therefore
less reactive towards nucleophiles.
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/78da5/78da527ccfc45197a380c8bc245f205572f3f83a" alt="relative reactivity order towards nucleophiles" |
These trends are supported by the
trends in the equilibrium data for the formation of hydrate (see
later)
|
Carbonyl
|
K / M-1
|
% Hydrate
|
|
Carbonyl
|
methanal
|
41
|
99.96
|
Hydrate
|
ethanal
|
1.8 x 10-2
|
50
|
2,2-dimethylpropanal
|
4.1 x 10-3
|
19
|
propanone
|
2.5 x 10-5
|
0.14
|
(K = [hydrate]/[C=O][H2O])